Seite 1 von 1
Dupondius Faustina older
Verfasst: Sa 24.10.15 14:03
von Paschulke
hello,
anyone an idea, wich refernce could it be?
weight: 12 g
diameter: 30 mm
Re: Dupondius Faustina older
Verfasst: Sa 24.10.15 15:41
von antoninus1
A very tired looking Faustina
Ceres with torch and Palladium.
RIC 1196 with bust to right. This bust to left is rare. It´s a worn but nice coin.
Re: Dupondius Faustina older
Verfasst: So 25.10.15 19:17
von curtislclay
Isn't the diameter of your coin actually c. 24-27 mm?
At 30 mm it would be a sestertius: but that wouldn't accord with a weight of 12 g, plus according to the British Museum Catalogue this reverse type was struck only on middle bronzes, not on sestertii.
Re: Dupondius Faustina older
Verfasst: So 25.10.15 19:36
von Paschulke
sure, diameter and weight are correctly.
Re: Dupondius Faustina older
Verfasst: Mo 26.10.15 21:32
von curtislclay
Could you show us a picture of the coin next to a ruler in mm, to confirm that its diameter is in fact 30 mm?
Re: Dupondius Faustina older
Verfasst: Di 27.10.15 16:06
von Paschulke
a.JPG[/attachment
[attachment=0]b.JPG
(the Dupondius right, a Sestertius with a weight of 26 g left)
Re: Dupondius Faustina older
Verfasst: Di 27.10.15 18:53
von curtislclay
curtislclay hat geschrieben:At 30 mm it would be a sestertius: but that wouldn't accord with a weight of 12 g, plus according to the British Museum Catalogue this reverse type was struck only on middle bronzes, not on sestertii.
On rechecking, I am relieved to find that this reverse type is indeed known on ordinary bust-right sestertii: BMC 1536-8, Cohen 268, RIC 1151.
So your coin is from sestertius (not middle-bronze) dies, and it is struck on a sestertius-size flan, which is however very thin and accordingly weighs only half as much as a normal sestertius should!
I am unaware of any parallel for such a thin and underweight Antonine sestertius. Yet the style and fabric of your coin leave no doubt that it is ancient and official!
Re: Dupondius Faustina older
Verfasst: Di 27.10.15 21:58
von Paschulke
many thanks for this statement!