Also wenn ein Verkäufer eine Münze von Licinius anbietet und dabei nicht mal weiss, in welchem Jahrhundert der liebe Kerl sein Regierungsdasein frönte, dann kannst du schon mal getrost davon ausgehen, dass er keine Ahnung von Römischen Münzen hat. Und von jemandem, der offensichtlich keine Ahnung von den Münzen hat die er anbietet, würde ich auch keine Stücke kaufen. Abgesehen davon dass man die Fälschung auch so erkennt, und dass es das Stück auch in echt gar nicht gibt...
Mach dir nichts draus, am Anfang der Sammlerkarriere sind solche Maleur wohl den meisten unterlaufen
Viele Grüsse
Pscipio
licinius silber
Moderator: Homer J. Simpson
- Peter43
- Beiträge: 13037
- Registriert: Mi 11.08.04 02:01
- Wohnort: Arae Flaviae, Agri Decumates
- Hat sich bedankt: 206 Mal
- Danksagung erhalten: 1924 Mal
- Kontaktdaten:
@fotbitter:
Zurück zu Deiner Frage zu den Silbermünzen von Licinius. Ich habe eben die folgende Information gefunden:
The argenteus of Licinius I is part of a series of 3, all minted c. 312-313 in Trier by Constantine I. They are all of billion and all of the same size ~18mm, and were either a (failed) attempt to introduce a new silver/billion denomination, or perhaps a special issue for some unknown purpose/occasion (perhaps celebrating Constantine's victory at Milvan bridge?).
The three coins are:
Constantine I - VICTORIA LAETAE PRINC PERP
Licinius I - IOVI CONSERVATORI (Emperor on back of eagle)
Maximinus II - SOLI INVICTO COMITI (Sol in quadriga)
An interesting point to note (which perhaps points to a special issue) is that these reverse-obverse pairings are fixed - Constantine didn't issue the Licinius or Max Daia reverse types for himself (nor were the reverse designs already used by them - althought the reverse legends were).
Of further interest is that although these coins never took off (hence their scarcity), the reverse designs were later "re-used". The VLPP reverse (your type) was later used on a few solidii (at Ticinum 313 & Rome 315, if memory serves), and then in 317 was introduced as an AE3 reverse. The Licinius emperor-on-eagle reverse was also reintroduced (by Constantine, and still only for Licinius) as an AE3 c.319. Maximinus II was killed in 313, so his type was not reused.
Mit freundlichem Gruß
Zurück zu Deiner Frage zu den Silbermünzen von Licinius. Ich habe eben die folgende Information gefunden:
The argenteus of Licinius I is part of a series of 3, all minted c. 312-313 in Trier by Constantine I. They are all of billion and all of the same size ~18mm, and were either a (failed) attempt to introduce a new silver/billion denomination, or perhaps a special issue for some unknown purpose/occasion (perhaps celebrating Constantine's victory at Milvan bridge?).
The three coins are:
Constantine I - VICTORIA LAETAE PRINC PERP
Licinius I - IOVI CONSERVATORI (Emperor on back of eagle)
Maximinus II - SOLI INVICTO COMITI (Sol in quadriga)
An interesting point to note (which perhaps points to a special issue) is that these reverse-obverse pairings are fixed - Constantine didn't issue the Licinius or Max Daia reverse types for himself (nor were the reverse designs already used by them - althought the reverse legends were).
Of further interest is that although these coins never took off (hence their scarcity), the reverse designs were later "re-used". The VLPP reverse (your type) was later used on a few solidii (at Ticinum 313 & Rome 315, if memory serves), and then in 317 was introduced as an AE3 reverse. The Licinius emperor-on-eagle reverse was also reintroduced (by Constantine, and still only for Licinius) as an AE3 c.319. Maximinus II was killed in 313, so his type was not reused.
Mit freundlichem Gruß
Omnes vulnerant, ultima necat.
- donolli
- Beiträge: 1500
- Registriert: Mi 24.03.04 12:12
- Wohnort: Raetia
- Hat sich bedankt: 17 Mal
- Danksagung erhalten: 30 Mal
hallo fotbitter!
deine münze steht übrigens auch (leider) in der "hall of fame der fälschungen" bei forumancientcoins
http://forumancientcoins.com/fakes/disp ... =2&pos=197
das stück ist demnach ein reines phantasiesück.
cheers donolli
deine münze steht übrigens auch (leider) in der "hall of fame der fälschungen" bei forumancientcoins
http://forumancientcoins.com/fakes/disp ... =2&pos=197
das stück ist demnach ein reines phantasiesück.
cheers donolli
Natura semina nobis scientiae dedit, scientiam non dedit. (Seneca)
-
- Vergleichbare Themen
- Antworten
- Zugriffe
- Letzter Beitrag
-
- 1 Antworten
- 739 Zugriffe
-
Letzter Beitrag von Rollentöter
-
- 12 Antworten
- 1005 Zugriffe
-
Letzter Beitrag von Hurrz
-
- 0 Antworten
- 522 Zugriffe
-
Letzter Beitrag von pottina
-
- 0 Antworten
- 964 Zugriffe
-
Letzter Beitrag von Gorme
-
- 2 Antworten
- 885 Zugriffe
-
Letzter Beitrag von olricus
Wer ist online?
Mitglieder in diesem Forum: 0 Mitglieder und 11 Gäste