What follows is only comment from an American perspective, for whatever it's worth:
The American coin-hobby has a very strong dislike for damaged coins--and I'm afraid (by American standards, anyway), this 1881s silver dollar is a "problem coin." (Please take a careful look at the obverse and see the extensive scratching both in the fields and on the portrait. Circulation wear is OK, bag-marks--the American hobby has a relatively high tolerance for. But this coin is...damaged.)
The 1881s (from San Francisco) is among the commonest dates in the series, and circulated examples generally sell in the U.S. at its silver value plus a few dollars.
So 1881s dollars are easy to find. There's really no good reason to settle for a "problem coin."
I'm sorry to be so emphatic about all this, but problem coins just never get better. If anything, over time, they get worse. (I know this because like most of the folks on the Forum, I've bought my share of dogs.)
I hope not to have given offense, and if you own this coin already, I apologize twice.
v.
